More To Investigate
The investigators found 13 fingerprints at the crime scene. None of these pertained to anyone at the factory or to Mr. Serrano. These were never compared to any of the databases of the various criminal investigative agencies available in the US. Also they found cigarette butts of which DNA was never obtained. As it is, Nelson doesn’t smoke.
It was found that the victims fought with their assailant or assailants, but none of the evidence found under their nails was analyzed. Also a plastic glove was found underneath one of the victims of which no fingerprints or DNA were found to be of Mr. Serrano! Who’s where they then??
At the onset, Mr. Serrano’s ex-partner blamed Mr. Serrano as the assailant. Based on this the authorities immediately searched Mr. Serrano’s house where several guns which Mr. Serrano collected were found, but none matched the murder weapon. The crime scene was covered in blood even the walls. The investigators couldn’t find any blood on any of Mr. Serrano’s clothes or belongings.
It is said that Mr. Serrano intended to kill his ex-partner and that the others were killed because he couldn’t leave behind anyone to identify him. Yet there were 2 murder weapons. So it takes more than one weapon to murder one person?
How can one man bring down & shoot 3 younger & well-built men considering also that the shots were not random but execution style, meaning at close range & in the back of the neck?
One of the victims was an assistant district attorney, aren’t there more possible reasons for someone to want to kill her?
There is more to investigate if we really want to obtain the truth.
Why do the authorities of Bartow give credit to evidence so fragile and they don’t further investigate the more concrete evidence?
Could it be that they don’t want to find out that Mr. Serrano is innocent?
Could it be that they don’t want to discover who the real assailant or assailants are?